Doug Beizer's May, 2005 article for Government Computer News, "Collaboration tools are ready for the battlefield" discusses how U.S. military units are implementing online, satellite-based collaboration software to make the sharing of critical information more efficient on the battlefield. Technology like this can be a godsend to our troops in the field, but can also be a nightmare if not secure against hackers.
Collaborative software, like Macromedia Breeze Live and Click to Meet, enables commanders in the field to transmit information and orders to superiors all at once, instead of having to have this same information relayed up and down the long chain of command ladder. Surely, this technology is saving friendly soldiers' lives.
Yet, typical of any increase in information sharing, the risk and stakes of computer piracy increase. If enemy hackers are able to gain access to such information and relay it to their comrades in arms, then the lapse in security could be extra deadly.
Also, what would the contingency be if these new, relied-upon technologies were compromised? Would the troops still be able to communicate effectively via traditional means?
This all reminds me of an interesting interview I caught on Federal News Radio's (AM 1500) daily "Cyber Security Update." In that piece, a government IT professional warned that American civilians should acknowledge what might happen if domestic telecommunication lines were compromised by a threatening nation's hackers.... perhaps, he said, the government might be forced to indefinitely shut down internet and telephone lines.
How would you react if such a contingency were ever to be put into effect? I shudder at the thought.
For the troops on the ground, this is a contingency they must constantly train for.
What Harry Means to Me
-
Instead of writing a review of how great Harry Potter and the Deathly
Hallows: Part II (because it's obvious how awesome it is), I thought I
would share wh...
12 years ago
That's a really good point you are presenting. People are not careful enough about information security on internet usually but when it comes to military, it comes with such a huge risk. I'm not really familiar with how much US military uses internet for its battlefield communication, but I'm sure the security will always be the issue... although I don't think shutting down the internet and telephone lines will be the best solution.
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad you brought this up. I think this technology is very dangerous, especially considering how often the government gets hacked or "loses information". It could have catastrophic consequences.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you. software is made by man and thus can also be breached bu the use of it in the warzone would not be a bad idea after all. certain restrictions and high security should be enforced to enable it work. i love this!!!
ReplyDeleteI never gave much thought to the question of what the government would do in the case of a full-scale "doomsday scenario" cyber attack, until I listened to the interview on 1500AM.
ReplyDeleteDoes the government really have the authority and/or capability to order a halt to all domestic telecommunications?
I guess all we have to reflect on such a scenario is how telephone lines became so jammed with calls on 9-11-01 in the NY metro area that many tele-carriers simply shut down their services temporarily to everyone but Emergency responders.
Just an interesting thing to ponder for the future